article

Read the Bill: Why We Need a Real 72-Hour Rule

October 5, 2026 · By Seth Russell

In December 2020, congressional leaders released a 5,593-page bill, one of the longest in American history, covering COVID relief and a full year of government funding. The text went public shortly before 2 p.m. Both chambers passed it that same night. (CBS News)

Nobody read it. Nobody could have read it. At a brisk two minutes a page, it would have taken more than a week of round-the-clock reading. Members voted on what leadership told them was in it, and the public found out the rest later.

That wasn't a fluke, and it isn't one party's sin. Today we're publishing our fifth common-sense bill to stop it: the 72-Hour Rule.

Both Parties Do It

Notice the pattern. Whoever is in the minority demands time to read the bill. Whoever is in the majority finds a reason why there isn't any.

"But Doesn't the House Already Have a 72-Hour Rule?"

Sort of. Since 2019, House rules have said bill text should be available for 72 hours before a floor vote. Before that, the rule said "three days," which could mean about a day and a half in practice. But it's a House rule, and a simple majority can waive it by passing a procedural "special rule" written by the Rules Committee. Critics call those "martial law" rules. Bills can also skip it entirely under suspension of the rules. (Congressional Research Service)

The Senate has no comparable standing rule at all.

A rule the majority can switch off whenever it's inconvenient isn't much of a rule. It gets switched off exactly when it matters most: the giant, deadline-driven packages that spend the most money and carry the most hidden riders.

Credit Where It's Due

We didn't invent this. For more than a decade, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has introduced the Read the Bills Act, which grew out of a 2006 proposal by the citizens' group DownsizeDC, to guarantee time to read every bill before a vote. It has died in committee every time, but the idea is right, and we're glad to build on it. (Wikipedia) Our goal is a version that's binding, workable on the floor, and able to win votes from both parties.

What Our Bill Does

The Honest Trade-offs

Why This Pairs With No Budget, No Pay

Earlier today we published No Budget, No Pay, a first step that holds Members' pay when they miss the budget deadline or shut the government down. A fair objection to any deadline pressure is that it might push Congress to rush. This bill answers that objection. Put them together and the rule becomes simple: do your job on time, and do it in the open.

You wouldn't sign a mortgage you weren't allowed to read. Congress shouldn't sign one on your behalf, either.

Read the bill, download the documents, and send it to your Representative →

Sources

• Congress passes 5,593-page COVID relief and government funding bill — CBS News
• Senate passes $1.7 trillion omnibus spending bill — Roll Call
• Read the full 4,155-page, $1.7 trillion government funding bill — The Hill
• House passes sweeping fiscal 2024 spending package — Roll Call
• Read the Bills Act — Wikipedia
• Sen. Paul looks to force Senate to read bills it passes — The Hill
• Availability of Legislative Measures in the House (The "72-Hour Rule") — Congressional Research Service

← No Budget, No Pay Borrowing a Trick From Volcanoes →
★ All Blog Posts →

Read the Bill Before You Vote on It

Read our 72-Hour Rule, download the documents, and send it to your Representative.

Read & Support the Bill ✎ Join the Movement