The Presidential Line-Item Veto

Cut Waste Line by Line—With a Fairness Guarantee So It Can't Be Weaponized

Take Action

When a wasteful item is buried inside a massive spending bill, the President today faces an all-or-nothing choice: sign the whole thing, pork included, or veto the entire bill and risk a shutdown. Forty-four of the fifty governors already have a line-item veto—the power to strike individual items—but the President of the United States does not.

Congress tried to grant it by ordinary law in 1996, and the Supreme Court struck that law down in Clinton v. City of New York (1998), ruling that it takes a constitutional amendment, not a statute, to do this the right way. So that's what we drafted—with a safeguard built into its core so it can never become a one-sided partisan weapon.

What the Amendment Does

The power to strike individual wasteful items from a spending bill—designed so it can never be used as a one-sided partisan weapon.

Why the Fairness Guarantee Is the Whole Point

A line-item veto in the wrong hands could become exactly the kind of partisan weapon we exist to oppose—a president slashing the other party's priorities while shielding his own. The parity requirement makes that impossible: any cut aimed at one party's items must be matched by a roughly equal cut to every other major party's items in the same bill. The result is a tool that can only be used the way it's supposed to be—to cut genuine pork, evenly, out in the open—not to punish the other team.

This is a discussion draft prepared for review by legislative counsel and for presentation to Members of Congress—proposed constitutional text, not final legislative language. The wording will keep tightening as it moves forward.

Part of a Pair

We see the Presidential Line-Item Veto and the Balanced Budget Amendment as a natural pair that works best together—the line-item veto is a scalpel for cutting waste, and the balanced budget is the ceiling that makes cutting it matter. We've listed and drafted them separately, though, so that either one can move as fast as the process will allow. Neither is held hostage to the other.

Download the Documents

Read the full text, share it, and—most importantly—send it to your Representative. All three are formatted Word documents you can print or attach to an email.

One-Page Summary
The quick version—the whole idea at a glance. Great for sharing.
Plain-Language Explainer & Advocacy Guide
What it does, the Clinton v. New York fix, the fairness guarantee, and how to help.
Full Proposed Amendment Text
The complete section-by-section constitutional language.

Want both fiscal amendments together? The Balanced Budget page has its own downloads.

Step 1: Find Your Representative

An amendment has to be proposed by Congress before any state can ratify it, so the people to contact are your U.S. Representative and your two U.S. Senators. Not sure who they are?

Find Your U.S. Representative → Find Your U.S. Senators →

A short, specific message from a constituent carries real weight—far more than a mass-produced form letter. Personal calls to a district office count even more.

Step 2: Send a Message

Here's a letter you can use as a starting point. Make it your own—add a sentence about the pork-barrel spending that frustrates you most. Fill in the bracketed pieces, then paste it into your Representative's contact form or print and mail it.

Dear [Representative / Senator] [Last Name], As your constituent in [City/Town, State], I am writing to ask you to support—and to help introduce—a constitutional amendment giving the President a line-item veto over spending, with a built-in bipartisan fairness requirement. Forty-four of the fifty governors can already strike individual wasteful items from a spending bill; the President cannot. Congress tried to grant this power by statute in 1996, and the Supreme Court struck it down in Clinton v. City of New York (1998), holding that it takes a constitutional amendment. The version I support is written so it can never be a one-sided weapon: if the President cuts an item favoring one party, they must cut a roughly equal amount from the other party's items in the same bill, at the same time. Genuinely bipartisan items are exempt, and Congress can restore any item by a three-fifths vote out in the open. Full text and a plain-language explainer are available at commonsenseforamerica.org/line-item-veto. I would welcome the chance to know where you stand, and I hope you will consider introducing or co-sponsoring such an amendment. Thank you for your time and your service. Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Street Address] [City, State ZIP] [Email / Phone]

Consider attaching the one-page summary or the full text (above) so your Representative's office has the actual language in hand.

★ A Personal Pledge From Our Founder

The founder of the Common Sense for America Party has made a personal commitment to this fight:

If we can get real traction on these amendments in the House—and get them past that bar—I will personally travel, at my own expense, to each and every one of the 44 state legislatures that already have a line-item veto, to encourage them to ratify the federal version. Ratifying an amendment takes three-fourths of the states—38 of them—and we don't intend to walk that road from behind a desk.
← The Balanced Budget Amendment All Our Amendments →
★ Read the Full Platform →

Agree With This Position?

If common sense resonates with you, join the movement. We're building something different.

✎ Join the Movement ❤ Support the Cause